I really enjoyed reading/learning about West African society
in chapter 3. It’s not surprising that the Europeans often justified their
actions/mentality of the African slave trade by adhering to the misconception
that Africans didn’t have a “real” or somehow valid culture. To them the Africans
were considered “primitive”, backward, non-advanced societally. Hence, through
European eyes at the time, stripping Africans from their land and roots was deemed
perfectly acceptable. Yet what’s so interesting is how alive and complex many
West African cultures actually were. The book examines collectively a handful
of the larger groups: the Ashanti, Dahomeans, Mossi, and the Yoruba (although
there were clearly many, many other cultures as well, each with their own
unique characteristics and signatures). Of particular interest to me was the
level of political power women had in some of these African societies. The book
describes how the position of “mothers” was used as the male official’s
sidekick and in some societies; the queen mother was responsible for nominating
the king. This type of power, although women didn’t have the highest positions
of power, they, none the less, possessed a remarkable level of influence on
political activity. For being a perceived “primitive” society, many African
cultures seem to have been considerably ahead of their time. And certainly
ahead of European culture’s treatment/allowance of women as political figures
or having political roles of any sort. A woman in Europe at this time would
likely not have had the same rights afforded to her as a woman from Africa in this context.
No comments:
Post a Comment